|
|
||||||||
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
The field of information systems is premised on the centrality of information technology in everyday socio-economic life. Yet, drawing on a review of the full set of articles published in Information Systems Research (ISR) over the past ten years, we argue that the field has not deeply engaged its core subject matterthe information technology (IT) artifact. Instead, we find that IS researchers tend to give central theoretical significance to the context (within which some usually unspecified technology is seen to operate), the discrete processing capabilities of the artifact (as separable from its context or use), or the dependent variable (that which is posited to be affected or changed as technology is developed, implemented, and used). The IT artifact itself tends to disappear from view, be taken for granted, or is presumed to be unproblematic once it is built and installed. After discussing the implications of our findings, we propose a research direction for the IS field that begins to take technology as seriously as its effects, context, and capabilities. In particular, we propose that IS researchers begin to theorize specifically about IT artifacts, and then incorporate these theories explicitly into their studies. We believe that such a research direction is critical if IS research is to make a significant contribution to the understanding of a world increasingly suffused with ubiquitous, interdependent, and emergent information technologies.
National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia 22230
wanda{at}mit.edu
siacono{at}nsf.gov
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Polding, J. M. Baptista Nunes, and B. Kingston Assessing e-book model sustainability Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, December 1, 2008; 40(4): 255 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Piccoli Information Technology in Hotel Management: A Framework for Evaluating the Sustainability of IT-Dependent Competitive Advantage Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, August 1, 2008; 49(3): 282 - 296. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dabbish and R. Kraut Research Note--Awareness Displays and Social Motivation for Coordinating Communication Information Systems Research, June 1, 2008; 19(2): 221 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Overby Process Virtualization Theory and the Impact of Information Technology Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 277 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Pentland and M. S. Feldman Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization Organization Science, September 1, 2007; 18(5): 781 - 795. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Boland Jr., K. Lyytinen, and Y. Yoo Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Organization Science, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 631 - 647. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Schiller and M. Mandviwalla Virtual Team Research: An Analysis of Theory Use and a Framework for Theory Appropriation Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 12 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schwarz and C. Schwarz The Role of Latent Beliefs and Group Cohesion in Predicting Group Decision Support Systems Success Small Group Research, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 195 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Thatcher, R. S. Brower, and R. M. Mason Organizational Fields and the Diffusion of Information Technologies Within and Across the Nonprofit and Public Sectors: A Preliminary Theory The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2006; 36(4): 437 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Saunders and M. K. Ahuja Are All Distributed Teams the Same? Differentiating Between Temporary and Ongoing Distributed Teams Small Group Research, December 1, 2006; 37(6): 662 - 700. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Barrett, D. Grant, and N. Wailes ICT and Organizational Change: Introduction to the Special Issue Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2006; 42(1): 6 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Wagner and S. Newell Repairing ERP: Producing Social Order to Create a Working Information System Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2006; 42(1): 40 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bridgman and H. Willmott Institutions and Technology: Frameworks for Understanding Organizational Change--The Case of a Major ICT Outsourcing Contract Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2006; 42(1): 110 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Orlikowski and J. Yates ICT and Organizational Change: A Commentary Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2006; 42(1): 127 - 134. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Dinev and P. Hart An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions Information Systems Research, March 1, 2006; 17(1): 61 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Rein A reference model for designing effective reputation information systems Journal of Information Science, October 1, 2005; 31(5): 365 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Scott and G. Walsham Reconceptualizing and Managing Reputation Risk in the Knowledge Economy: Toward Reputable Action Organization Science, May 1, 2005; 16(3): 308 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sambamurthy Editorial Notes Information Systems Research, March 1, 2005; 16(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Soderlund The Role of Information and Communication Technology in Home Services: Telecare Does not Satisfy the Needs of the Elderly Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2004; 10(2): 127 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Devaraj, M. Fan, and R. Kohli Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics Information Systems Research, September 1, 2002; 13(3): 316 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Torkzadeh and G. Dhillon Measuring Factors that Influence the Success of Internet Commerce Information Systems Research, June 1, 2002; 13(2): 187 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |