Information Systems Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2006, pp. 415-424
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1060.0102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heninger, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hilmer, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Research Note: Individual Cognition and Dual-Task Interference in Group Support Systems

William G. Heninger, Alan R. Dennis, Kelly McNamara Hilmer

School of Accountancy, Marriott School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Operations and Decision Technologies Department, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Operations and Decision Technologies Department, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405

heninger{at}byu.edu
ardennis{at}indiana.edu
kmac{at}indiana.edu

Previous research shows that synchronous text discussion through group support systems (GSS) can improve the exchange of information within teams, but this improved information exchange usually does not improve decisions because participants fail to process the new information they receive. This study examined one potential cause for this failure: Dual-task interference caused by the need to concurrently process new information from others while also contributing one’s own information to the discussion. Although prior research argues that dual-task interference should be minimal, we found that it significantly reduced participants’ information processing and led to lower decision quality. The effect sizes were large, suggesting that dual-task interference is one of a handful of major factors that exert the greatest influence on information processing and decision-making performance. We believe that these results call for an increased emphasis on and understanding of the cognitive underpinnings of GSS and virtual team decision making.

Key Words: group support systems; GSS; synchronous text discussion; decision making; collaboration technology; dual-task interference; individual cognition; information exchange; information processing; virtual teams; cognitive interference



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Information Systems ResearchHome page
L. P. Robert Jr., A. R. Dennis, and M. K. Ahuja
Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams
Information Systems Research, September 1, 2008; 19(3): 314 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.